All RFP Software Providers

Search the response-software catalogue, filter pricing disclosure and compare two providers using the same fields.

Filters and A–Z below apply to the six other catalogue entries; Savix remains above the filtered results.

6 providers below. Savix remains above; A–Z sorts matching results by name.

Loopio

Loopio

Loopio organizes a repeatable response operation around an approved content library. Its recorded capabilities include AI drafting and content matching, tagged answers with review dates and version history, contributor approvals, subject-matter expert recommendations and reporting. Spreadsheet, document and portal work sits alongside branded proposal output. CRM, storage and chat connections support cross-functional reuse. It is a relevant comparison when a proposal team is prepared to own library migration, answer freshness and the review process after launch.

♧ Trial: Trial terms not confirmed; ask the vendor
Pricing: Pricing on request

Responsive

Responsive

Responsive, formerly RFPIO, supports a broad response program: Answering Agent and AI Draft create cited answers, requirements analysis organizes the opportunity, and a governed library stores reusable Q&A and documents. Assignment, intake, approvals and reporting connect contributors across projects. The source record also describes no-code agents and controlled trust profiles. Compare the essential RFP workflow separately from additional modules, user licenses and connectors so that the proposed package matches the operation you actually intend to run.

♧ Trial: Trial terms not confirmed; ask the vendor
Pricing: $10,000/year · starting platform fee; licenses and extras additional

Arphie

Arphie

Arphie drafts RFP, DDQ and questionnaire answers from connected company knowledge, with citations for reviewer inspection. Its live-source approach connects repositories such as Google Drive, SharePoint and Confluence; content freshness features flag stale material and Smart Merge handles duplicate Q&A and legacy-library migration. Word and Excel question detection and original-format export are recorded capabilities. Evaluate source ownership, permission changes and answer refresh together with the quote’s concurrent-project definition.

♧ Trial: Trial terms not confirmed; ask the vendor
Pricing: Pricing on request

Inventive AI

Inventive AI

Inventive AI combines response drafting with content and quality-control workflows. The source record describes opportunity fit analysis, grounded drafting across files and portals, checks for requirement gaps and contradictory answers, and flags for stale or duplicate knowledge. Uploads, Q&A, websites and connected repositories feed the library; assignment, approvals, permissions and version history support review. A useful pilot tests conflicting policy sources and a narrative proposal, while procurement scopes the platform and response-volume allowance.

♧ Trial: Trial terms not confirmed; ask the vendor
Pricing: $10,000/yr · starting price; usage-based quote

AutoRFP.ai

AutoRFP.ai

AutoRFP.ai connects cited AI answers, browser and portal completion, maintained knowledge and team review. Recorded workflows cover Excel, Word, PDF, SAP Ariba and OneTrust, with original or branded exports. Source ownership, review schedules, assignments and audit trails support ongoing response work; assistant and MCP connections extend knowledge access. Its commercial comparison should start with annual project volume and occasional contributors. Ask how amendments, linked opportunities and repeat submissions count before selecting a package.

♧ Trial: No free trial confirmed; conditional 30-day money-back guarantee
Pricing: $899/mo · billed annually; 24 projects/year

Conveyor

Conveyor

Conveyor brings security questionnaire responses and buyer-facing trust content into one evaluation. It drafts in original and portal formats, links answers to sources, detects stale or conflicting knowledge and routes incoming requests for review. Its trust center lets buyers request security material through access and NDA workflows; API and assistant connections are also recorded. Evaluate questionnaire automation and trust-document distribution as separate workflows. The free trust-center tier is not evidence that full response automation is included.

♧ Trial: Trial advertised; duration unpublished. Free plan excludes questionnaire automation.
Pricing: Pricing on request
△