# Savix pricing: the seat-count decision
- Canonical page: [Savix Pricing: Starter vs Team & Seat-Cost Examples](https://rfpproviders.com/pricing/savix/)
- Published: 2026-10-25
- Updated: 2026-10-25
Compare the license model against the people who actually draft, review and approve your responses.
**Savix**
Explore source-led RFP answer review alongside the products below.
Starter: $99/seat/month; Team: $299/month (up to 10 members) · Trial available; duration and payment requirements at signup
[Visit Savix ↗](https://www.savix.io/?r=rfpaihub)
## Table of contents
1. [Plan scope and billing](https://rfpproviders.com/pricing/savix/#plans)
2. [Seat-count budget examples](https://rfpproviders.com/pricing/savix/#arithmetic)
3. [What remains outside the arithmetic](https://rfpproviders.com/pricing/savix/#ownership)
4. [Purchase acceptance checklist](https://rfpproviders.com/pricing/savix/#pilot)
5. [Sources and next steps](https://rfpproviders.com/pricing/savix/#references)
## Start with the contracted role mix
Savix links may generate referral compensation.
| Plan | Published USD price | Listed capacity | Recorded plan scope |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Starter | $99/seat/month | Up to 10 licensed seats | - Monthly billing
- RFP parsing and AI drafting
- Knowledge library
- Evidence review |
| Team | $299/month | Up to 10 members | - Flat monthly price
- Team review and assignments
- Evidence review and export |
USD. Starter is billed monthly per licensed seat; Team is a flat monthly subscription. Trial duration and payment requirements are shown during signup. Older RFP landing copy advertises a fixed trial; the current pricing page does not confirm that duration.
**Trial:** Trial available; duration and payment requirements at signup. Check the signup terms before providing payment information. Do not treat an older fixed-duration promotion as a current contractual term.
## Subscription-only examples at three seat counts
Illustrative budget arithmetic uses the published USD monthly rates above, the stated seat caps and the same rate for 12 months. These are not annual-plan quotes, commitments, discounts or total ownership estimates. Taxes, services, future price changes and internal work are excluded. The Team amount stays flat only within its listed member allowance; this assumes the same headcount for the entire illustration.
| People counted for the example | Starter subscription only | Team subscription only | Buying question |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | $99 / month
$1,188 over 12 months | $299 / month
$3,588 over 12 months | Check whether a single licensed editor can serve your review process. |
| 4 | $396 / month
$4,752 over 12 months | $299 / month
$3,588 over 12 months | Confirm which contributors need a licensed seat and whether the Team workflow fits. |
| 10 (shared listed maximum) | $990 / month
$11,880 over 12 months | $299 / month
$3,588 over 12 months | Validate the role mix and any expansion beyond the stated cap before buying. |
The arithmetic treats every person in the Starter column as a licensed seat and the same people as members in the Team column. It does not establish that the plans have identical permissions or workflow. Confirm your actual mix of editors, occasional reviewers and administrators. No month-to-month cancellation right or annual commitment is inferred from these calculations.
## Subscription cost is only one budget line
### Work the team still owns
Budget source cleanup, answer ownership, approval time, connector administration and submission checks. Measure them with a representative response rather than assuming the product removes them.
### Commercial questions still open
Obtain written onboarding scope and charges, support boundaries, storage and usage allowances, overage treatment, expansion beyond the member cap, renewal and exit conditions. Public plan labels are not an unlimited-usage promise.
[Use the broader RFP software TCO worksheet →](https://rfpproviders.com/pricing/)
## Acceptance tasks before selecting the plan
1. Write down which people draft, review, administer and approve. Ask Savix to map each role to the proposed plan and licensing rule.
2. Import a redacted buyer workbook and an approved source pack. Include an expired statement and a question with no supporting source.
3. Test evidence review, assignments and a rejected answer that needs revision. Confirm the decision history and access boundaries for ordinary reviewers.
4. Have the submission owner inspect the final exported file. Log repairs and unresolved exceptions.
5. Request a written quote that confirms the plan scope, cap, billing and exit terms. Add internal operating work to the subscription arithmetic.
## Sources, review boundary and related decisions
Selected-source check: 2026-10-25. Earlier research baseline: 2026-09-07.
- [www.savix.io/](https://www.savix.io/) — vendor claim
- [www.savix.io/pricing](https://www.savix.io/pricing) — vendor claim
- [www.savix.io/rfp-automation](https://www.savix.io/rfp-automation) — vendor claim
- [www.savix.io/evidence-verification](https://www.savix.io/evidence-verification) — vendor claim
Official-source research, not hands-on testing. Features are vendor claims; security controls, connectors and contractual terms require validation.
Selected official sources were checked on the date shown above; that is separate from the earlier full research baseline. The price calculations are a procurement illustration, not hands-on testing or a full vendor security assessment.
[Read the Savix procurement profile →](https://rfpproviders.com/reviews/savix/) · [Compare provider pricing models →](https://rfpproviders.com/pricing/) · [Savix vs Loopio buying comparison →](https://rfpproviders.com/compare/savix-vs-loopio/)
For the next buying decision, [compare Savix with a library-led Loopio rollout](https://rfpproviders.com/compare/savix-vs-loopio/).